The offer in question was never accepted, expressly, by the company Dukagjini l.l.c. The Applicant alleges that this debt should be paid to Dukagjini l.l.c, because it derives from the bid made by the Applicant to the company Dukagjini l.l.c, through which the Applicant offered to build the infrastructure, system and virtual network maintenance. The Court notes that, in the circumstances of the present case, the substantive issue relates to the allegation of the existence of a contractual obligation, namely a debt, for which the Applicant alleges that it was not paid by the respondent, Dukagjini l.l.c. The Referral was submitted by Ipko Telecomunications, represented by the Law Firm “Sejdiu & Qerkini” l.l.c. Keywords: Individual referral, contractual obligation, inadmissible referral, manifestly ill-founded referral KI121/19 Resolution on Inadmissibility of 29 July 2020, published on 17 August 2020 14/2019 of the Supreme Court of Kosovo, of 30 April 2019 KI121/19 Applicant: Ipko Telecomunications, Constitutional review of Judgment ERev.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |